This profile for the Wilshire Law Firm is one in a series of seven for my breakdown of the law firms who most commonly file web accessibility lawsuits. In each profile, I summarize common and/or repetitive elements found in multiple lawsuits.
Plaintiff(s): Valerie Brooks
Plaintiff’s lawyer: Thiago M. Coelho, Wilshire Law Firm
Lawsuit venue: United States District Court for the Eastern District of California
Legal claim: Because of the inaccessibility of the Defendant’s website, blind and visually-impaired users cannot fully and equally use or enjoy the facilities and services Defendant offers to the public on its website. (violation of the ADA)
Federal Law: Title III of the ADA, 42 U.S.C. § 12181, et seq.
State Law: Unruh Civil Rights Act, California Civil Code § 51 Et Seq.
Specific claims (summary): lack of alt text, empty links, redundant links, linked images missing alt-text
I’m the Chief Accessibility & Legal Officer at eSSENTIAL Accessibility. We’re a top digital accessibility company that provides an all-in-one solution to help organizations make their digital assets (e.g. website, app, etc.) accessible and prevent demand letters in 2021.
Need help evaluating the claims made in a demand letter? We can provide documentation of your website or app’s accessibility in regards to the claims made. Of course, eSSENTIAL’s primary services revolve around website and app accessibility and providing clients with best practices for legal compliance.
I think eSSENTIAL Accessibility is the best value among reputable accessibility companies because we include everything you need – manual audits, user testing, tech support, training, and more for one fixed cost.
You can email me at firstname.lastname@example.org to learn more.