Acacia Barros, P.A. is one of the most active law firms in ADA website accessibility litigation. Plaintiffs represented include Aishia Petersen and Raymond T. Mahlberg.
In the video above, I cover the website accessibility claims made in a complaint filed by Acacia Barros, Esq.. in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida Miami Division.
My ADA Compliance Course contains step-by-step instructions on how to find (audit) and fix (remediate) the most commonly claimed accessibility issues by plaintiffs’ lawyers (including Acacia Barros).
The course is specifically designed as an SOP (step-by-step instructions) for website owners to give to their web team. You can buy the course now at:
Below is previous profile information created from an older complaint.
Lawsuit venue: United States District Court Southern District of Florida Miami Division
Legal claim: Defendant has denied Plaintiff’s rights under the Americans with Disabilities Act or ADA because defendant’s mobile app is inaccessible to blind and visually-impaired consumers.
Federal Law: Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§s 12181-12189 (“ADA”), 28 U.S.C. §2201 and 2202 as well as 28 CFR Part 36 Regulations
Specific claims (summary): mobile app inaccessibility
Need help with compliance best practices and making your website or app accessible?
You can reach me at email@example.com.