This profile for the Cohen & Mizrahi LLP is one in a series of seven for my breakdown of the law firms who most commonly file web accessibility lawsuits. In each profile, I summarize common and/or repetitive elements found in multiple lawsuits.
Plaintiff(s): Christian Sanchez
Plaintiff’s lawyer: Joseph H. Mizrahi, Esq.
Lawsuit venue: United States District Court Southern District of New York
Legal claim: Because Defendant’s website is not equally accessible to blind and visually-impaired consumers, it violates the ADA.
Federal Law: Title III of the ADA,42 U.S.C. § 12181,et seq., and 28 U.S.C. § 1332
State Law and Local Law: New York State Human Rights Law, N.Y. Exec. Law Article 15, (“NYSHRL”) and New York City Human Rights Law, N.Y.C. Admin. Code § 8-101 et seq., (“NYCHRL”)
Specific claims (summary): the logo acts as a link and is not labeled, the products have text that describes the item details and price but the information is not fully labeled to be read by a screen reader
I’m the Chief Accessibility & Legal Officer at eSSENTIAL Accessibility. We’re a reputable company that is hyper focused on providing services that help clients achieve and maintain accessibility and prevent demand letters in 2021.
If you need help with documentation for responding to a demand letter, making your website or app accessible, or compliance best practices, feel free to contact me.
At eSSENTIAL, we provide a really great value for clients. The unlimited web accessibility tech support for your developers alone is amazing.
You can email me at email@example.com.